Berlin reactivator¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ Angle¾¾ 2±Þ 1·ù ºÎÁ¤±³ÇÕÀÇ Ä¡Ç迹
A CASE REPORT ON TREATMENT OF ANGLE'S CLASS ¥± DIVISION 1 MALOCCLUSION BY BERLIN REACTIVATOR
À±¿µ¼ö, ±èÁö¿µ, ±è¿ë³²,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
À±¿µ¼ö ( ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±èÁö¿µ ( ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
±è¿ë³² ( ) - Àü³²´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ ¼Ò¾ÆÄ¡°úÇб³½Ç
KMID : 0358919880150010185
Abstract
¼¾ð
¾Ç±â´É ±³Á¤ÀåÄ¡´Â ¼ºÀåÁß¿¡ ÀÖ´Â ¾Æµ¿ÀÇ ¾È¸é°ñ°Ý(Condylar and sutural area)¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ»
¹ÌÄ¥ »Ó ¾Æ´Ï¶ó Ä¡¾Æ ¹× Ä¡Á¶°ñ ºÎÀ§¿¡µµ ±³Á¤·ÂÀ» ¹ßÈÖÇÏ´Â ÀåÄ¡·Î½á ÀÚ¿¬ÀûÀÎ ±â´É·Â
(functional force)À» À¯µµ, Àü´Þ, Á¦°ÅÇÏ´Â ±âÀü¿¡ ÀÇÇØ¼ ±× È¿°ú¸¦ ¹ßÈÖÇÑ´Ù.
ÀÌ·¯ÇÑ °¡Ã¶¼º ±³Á¤ÀåÄ¡ÀÇ ¹ß´ÞÀº 1879³â¿¡ kingsley°¡ 'inclined bite plane'À» °í¾ÈÇÏ¿©
°úµµÇÏ°Ô ÈĹ濡 À§Ä¡ÇÑ ÇϾÇÀÇ °æ¿ì¿¡¼ ÇϾǰñÀÇ Àü¹æÀÌ µ¿À̳ª 'Jumping the bite'À» ½Ã
µµÇÑ ÀÌ·¡·Î Pierre RobinsÀº 'Monoblock'À», AndresenÀº 'Biomechanical working
retainer'¸¦ °í¾ÈÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ƯÈ÷ AndreasenÀº Hauple°ú ÇÔ²² ÀÚ½ÅÀÌ °í¾ÈÇÑ ÀåÄ¡¸¦ ¿¬±¸ÇÑ
°á°ú ±Ù·ÂÀ» activate ½ÃŰ´Â ´É·ÂÀÌ ÀÖ´Ù°í ÇÏ¿© 'Activator'¶õ ¸íĪÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ¶ÇÇÑ
À̵éÀº 1936³â FKO(Functions Kiefer Orthopedie)¶ó ±×ÈÄ Bimler´Â ¡¸Bimler appliance¡¹¸¦
Stockfish´Â ¡¸kinetor¡¹¸¦ Balters´Â ¡¸bionato¡¹r¸¦ °í¾ÈÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç ±×ÈÄ¿¡µµ °è¼ÓÀûÀ¸·Î º¯Çü °³¹ßµÇ¾ú´Ù.
#ÃÊ·Ï#
The patient, 8 years 9 months old male, complained of protrusion of upper anterior
teeth. As a result of clinical examination and cephalometric analysis, it was revealed
forward relationship in maxilla, but normal in mandible.
This patient was treated with Berlin reactivator combined with extraoral headgear.
After 9 months, the following results were obtained :
1. Canine and molar relationship was improved.
2. The overjet was somewhat improved.
3. Forward maxillary growth was inhibited.
4. Relations of the upper and lower jaws (ANB difference) were improved.
Ű¿öµå
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸