Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Survey of the real-world re-use of disposable dental supplies in dental offices

Çѱ¹Ä¡À§»ýÇÐȸÁö 2019³â 19±Ç 1È£ p.141 ~ 149
¹Úº¸¿µ, ¹®¼ÒÁ¤, Á¤¿ø±Õ, ÃÖÀº½Ç, ³ëÈñÁø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹Úº¸¿µ ( Park Bo-Young ) - Yonsei University Graduate School Department of Dental Hygiene
¹®¼ÒÁ¤ ( Mun So-Jung ) - Yonsei University Wonju College of Medicine Department of Dental Hygiene
Á¤¿ø±Õ ( Chung Won-Gyun ) - Korea University Graduate School Department of Public Health Sciences
ÃÖÀº½Ç ( Choi Eun-Sil ) - Korea University Graduate School Department of Public Health Sciences
³ëÈñÁø ( Noh Hie-Jin ) - Yonsei University Graduate School Department of Dental Hygiene

Abstract


Objectives: To investigate the real-world re-use of disposable dental supplies (DDS) in dental offices and assess the relationship between general characteristics of dental hygienists and reuse of DDS, with respect to infection control characteristics.

Methods: A questionnaire was administered to 277 dental hygienists to assess their general characteristics, awareness of infection control/DDS management, and re-use of DDS. Nine DDS were categorized into the following categories based on their purpose: Critical, Semicritical, Noncritical, and Personal protective equipment (PPE). The association between general characteristics of dental hygienists and re-use of DDS, with respect to infection control characteristics, was assessed using the chi-squared test.

Results: All 9 DDS were re-used to different extents. The highest reuse rate of supplies were for masks (64.6%), prophylaxis cups (61.0%) and plastic saliva ejectors (30.0%). Overall, 89.5% of the participants re-used DDS; subgroup analysis showed the following proportions of specific DDS re-use: PPE 66.4%; Semicritical DDS 63.9%; Noncritical DDS 19.5%; and Critical DDS 1.8%. Based on the type of clinic, the rate of re-use was higher in dental clinics than dental hospitals. Thus, the re-use of DDS may be caused by inappropriate or nonexistent guidelines or habitual practice, rather than the awareness or attitude of dental hygienists.

Conclusions: In order to ensure a safe environment within the dental clinic, DDS classifications must be clearly outlined in the dental infection control guidelines; moreover, additional studies are needed regarding the regulations for DDS re-use and disposal.

Å°¿öµå

Dental hygienist; Dental office; Infection control

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI