Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Evaluation and comparison of the marginal adaptation of two different substructure materials

The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2015³â 7±Ç 3È£ p.257 ~ 263
Tahir Karaman, Sabiha Zelal Ulku, Ali Ihsan Zengingul, Sedat Guven, Veysel Eratilla, Ebru Sumer,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Tahir Karaman ) - Firat University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics
 ( Sabiha Zelal Ulku ) - Dicle University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics
 ( Ali Ihsan Zengingul ) - Dicle University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics
 ( Sedat Guven ) - Dicle University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics
 ( Veysel Eratilla ) - Diyarbakir Oral and Dental Health Center
 ( Ebru Sumer ) - Diyarbakir Oral and Dental Health Center

Abstract


PURPOSE : In this study, we aimed to evaluate the amount of marginal gap with two different substructure materials using identical margin preparations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS : Twenty stainless steel models with a chamfer were prepared with a CNC device. Marginal gap measurements of the galvano copings on these stainless steel models and Co-Cr copings obtained by a laser-sintering method were made with a stereomicroscope device before and after the cementation process and surface properties were evaluated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). A dependent t-test was used to compare the mean of the two groups for normally distributed data, and two-way variance analysis was used for more than two data sets. Pearson's correlation analysis was also performed to assess relationships between variables.

RESULTS : According to the results obtained, the marginal gap in the galvano copings before cementation was measured as, on average, 24.47 ¡¾ 5.82 ¥ìm before and 35.11 ¡¾ 6.52 ¥ìm after cementation; in the laser-sintered Co-Cr structure, it was, on average, 60.45 ¡¾ 8.87 ¥ìm before and 69.33 ¡¾ 9.03 ¥ìm after cementation. A highly significant difference (P<.001) was found in marginal gap measurements of galvano copings and a significant difference (P<.05) was found in marginal gap measurements of the laser-sintered Co-Cr copings. According to the SEM examination, surface properties of laser sintered Co-Cr copings showed rougher structure than galvano copings. The galvano copings showed a very smooth surface.

CONCLUSION : Marginal gaps values of both groups before and after cementation were within the clinically acceptable level. The smallest marginal gaps occurred with the use of galvano copings.

Å°¿öµå

Galvano crowns; Marginal adaptation; Laser sintered Co-Cr; Electroformed coping; Biocompatibility

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed