Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Evaluation of marginal and internal gap of three-unit metal framework according to subtractive manufacturing and additive manufacturing of CAD/CAM systems

The Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2017³â 9±Ç 6È£ p.463 ~ 469
±èµ¿¿¬, ±è¾îºó, ±èÇØ¿µ, ±èÁöȯ, ±è¿õö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èµ¿¿¬ ( Kim Dong-Yeon ) - Korea University College of Health Science Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering
±è¾îºó ( Kim Eo-Bin ) - Korea University College of Health Science Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering
±èÇØ¿µ ( Kim Hae-Young ) - Korea University Graduate School Department of Public Health Sciences
±èÁöȯ ( Kim Ji-Hwan ) - Korea University College of Health Science Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering
±è¿õö ( Kim Woong-Chul ) - Korea University College of Health Science Department of Dental Laboratory Science and Engineering

Abstract


PURPOSE: To evaluate the fit of a three-unit metal framework of fixed dental prostheses made by subtractive and additive manufacturing.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: One master model of metal was fabricated. Twenty silicone impressions were made on the master die, working die of 10 poured with Type 4 stone, and working die of 10 made of scannable stone. Ten three-unit wax frameworks were fabricated by wax-up from Type IV working die. Stereolithography files of 10 three-unit frameworks were obtained using a model scanner and three-dimensional design software on a scannable working die. The three-unit wax framework was fabricated using subtractive manufacturing (SM) by applying the prepared stereolithography file, and the resin framework was fabricated by additive manufacturing (AM); both used metal alloy castings for metal frameworks. Marginal and internal gap were measured using silicone replica technique and digital microscope. Measurement data were analyzed by Kruskal-Wallis H test and Mann-Whitney U-test (¥á=.05).

RESULTS: The lowest and highest gaps between premolar and molar margins were in the SM group and the AM group, respectively. There was a statistically significant difference in the marginal gap among the 3 groups (P<.001). In the marginal area where pontic was present, the largest gap was 149.39 ¡¾ 42.30 ¥ìm in the AM group, and the lowest gap was 24.40 ¡¾ 11.92 ¥ìm in the SM group.

CONCLUSION: Three-unit metal frameworks made by subtractive manufacturing are clinically applicable. However, additive manufacturing requires more research to be applied clinically.

Å°¿öµå

CAD/CAM; Micro-stereolithography; Metal framework; Marginal gap; Internal gap

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed