Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Periodontal biotype modification using a volume-stable collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft for the treatment of gingival recession: a case series

Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science 2018³â 48±Ç 6È£ p.395 ~ 404
±èÇöÁÖ, ÀåÇýÀ±, ±è¼ºÅÂ, ¼³¾çÁ¶, ±èÇüÀÏ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÇöÁÖ ( Kim Hyun-Ju ) - Seoul National University Dental Hospital Department of Periodontics
ÀåÇýÀ± ( Chang Hye-Yoon ) - Seoul National University School of Dentistry Department of Periodontology
±è¼ºÅ ( Kim Sung-Tae ) - Seoul National University School of Dentistry Department of Periodontology
¼³¾çÁ¶ ( Seol Yang-Jo ) - Seoul National University School of Dentistry Department of Periodontology
±èÇüÀÏ ( Kim Hyeong-Il ) - University at Buffalo School of Dental Medicine Department of Restorative Dentistry

Abstract


Purpose: The purpose of this study was to propose a technique for periodontal biotype modification through thickening of the entire facial aspect using a volume-stable collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial connective tissue graft (CTG) for the treatment of gingival recession.

Methods: Four systemically healthy patients showing Miller class I or class II gingival recession in the mandibular incisor area were included in this study. Full-mouth scaling and root planing procedures were performed at least 4 weeks prior to periodontal plastic surgery. A split-thickness flap with a horizontal intrasulcular incision and 2 vertical incisions was used in cases 1?3, and the modified tunnel technique was used in case 4 for coronal advancement of the mucogingival complex. After the exposed root surfaces were debrided thoroughly, double-layered volume-stable collagen matrix was placed on the apical part of the recession and a subepithelial CTG harvested from the palatal area was placed on the coronal part. The amount of root coverage at 3 months postoperatively was evaluated in cases 1?3, and facio-lingual volumetric changes were analyzed in cases 1 and 2.

Results: Healing was uneventful in all 4 cases and complete root coverage was shown in cases 1?3. In case 4, reduction of gingival recession was observed at 3 months after surgery. In cases 1 and 2, a comparison of stereolithographic files from the preoperative and postoperative time points demonstrated that the entire facio-lingual volume had increased.

Conclusions: The surgical technique suggested herein, using a volume-stable collagen matrix and autogenous subepithelial CTG, may be an effective method for periodontal biotype modification through thickening of the entire facial aspect for the treatment of gingival recession.

Å°¿öµå

Connective tissue; Gingival recession; Transplantation

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed