¼º°ß¿¡ ÀÖ¾î¼ Ä¡Á¶Á¦º¸Á¸¼úÀ» À§ÇÑ Ä¡¾Æ»ÀÀ̽ÄÀçÀÇ È¿°ú
The Effect of Tooth Biomaterial for Socket Preservation in Dog
ÁÖÇöÁß, Àåȯ¿ë, ÀÌÁø¿ë, ÀåÇö¼®, ÀÓÀç¼®, ÀÌÀǼ®,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÁÖÇöÁß ( Joo Hyun-Joong ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ±¸°¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
Àåȯ¿ë ( Jang Hwan-Yong ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ±¸°¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÁø¿ë ( Lee Jin-Yong ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ±¸°¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀåÇö¼® ( Jang Hyun-Seok ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ±¸°¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÓÀç¼® ( Rim Jae-Suk ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ±¸°¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
ÀÌÀǼ® ( Lee Eui-Seok ) - °í·Á´ëÇб³ ±¸°¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°úÇб³½Ç
KMID : 1146620140030020030
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this study was to compare histologic evaluation of autogenous and allogenous tooth material on bone-healing response in dog.
Materials and Methods: Allogenous tooth biomaterial was grafted in the extraction socket of the premolar region in the left lower jaws and autogenous tooth biomaterial was grafted in the right side after 2 weeks. Three dogs were sacrificed after 4, 8, 12 weeks each for histological evaluation.
Results: In the histologic analysis, there were no signigicant differences between group 1 (autogenous tooth bone biomaterial) and group 2 (allogenous tooth bone biomaterial) at 4, 8, 12 weeks. Statistical analysis showed that group 1 was more higher bone volume levels than group 2 at 4 weeks (P?0.05, Mann-whitney test). Group 2 showed more higher bone volume levels than group 1 at 8 weeks and group 1 more than group 2 at 12 weeks but that showed no significant differences (P¢´0.05, Mann-whitney test).
Conclusion: Histologically, autogenous and allogenous tooth biomaterial reveals similar healing patterns in extraction socket in dogs. The result of this study suggested that tooth biomaterials could be useful materials for socket preservation.
Ű¿öµå
Tooth biomaterial; Socket preservation; Bone regeneration
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸