Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ä¡ÁúÀ» Åõ°úÇÑ Á¶»ç±¤¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø ÁßÇսà ġÁúÀÇ µÎ²², ±¤¼¼±â ¹× Á¶»ç ½Ã°£ÀÌ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ Ç¥¸é °æµµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ

SURFACE HARDNESS OF THE DENTAL COMPOSITE CURED BY LIGHT THAT PENETRATE TOOTH STRUCTURE ACCORDING TO THICKNESS OF TOOTH STRUCTURE, LIGHT INTENSITY AND CURING TIME

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Á¸ÇÐȸÁö 2005³â 30±Ç 2È£ p.128 ~ 137
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¶¼ö°æ/Cho SK ±èµ¿ÁØ/ȲÀ±Âù/¿À¿ø¸¸/ȲÀγ²/Kim DJ/Hwang YC/Oh WM/Hwang IN

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â Ä¡ÁúÀ» Åõ°úÇÑ ±¤¿¡³ÊÁö·®À» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ°í Ä¡ÁúÀ» Åõ°úÇÑ ±¤¿¡³ÊÁö¿¡ ÀÇÇÑ ±¤ÁßÇÕ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ ÁßÇÕ Á¤µµ¸¦ Ç¥¸é °æµµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿© ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±¤Á¶»ç±â·Î´Â ÇÒ·Î°Õ ±¤¿øÀ» »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â Optilux 501 (Demetron, USA)À» »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, ÁßÇÕ¿ë light guide´Â 840 mW/$cm^2ÀÇ ±¤¼¼±â¸¦ °®´Â Á÷°æ 12 mmÀÇ light guide¿Í 1100 nW/$cm^2$ÀÇ ±¤¼¼±â¸¦ °®´Â Á÷°æ 7 mmÀÇ Turbo light guide¸¦ »ç¿ëÇÏ¿´´Ù. ±¤¿øÀ» Åõ°ú½Ãų Ä¡ÁúÀº °ÇÀüÇÑ »ó¾Ç ÁßÀýÄ¡ÀÇ ¼ø¸é¿¡¼­ºÎÅÍ ¹ý¶ûÁú°ú »ó¾ÆÁúÀ» Æ÷ÇÔÇϵµ·Ï $0.7{\times}0.7\;cm$ÀÇ Å©±â·Î µÎ²² 1.0 mm¿Í 2.0 mmÀÇ Ä¡¾Æ ÀýÆíÀ» ÁغñÇÏ¿´´Ù. Á÷°æ 5 mm, µÎ²² 2 mmÀÇ ÁÖÇü¿¡ Al »ö»óÀÇ ±¤ÁßÇÕ º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø(Charisma, Kulzer, Germany)À» ÃæÀüÇÏ°í °¢ ±º¿¡ ÁÖ¾îÁø Á¶°Ç¿¡ µû¶ó ±¤ÁßÇÕÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÃÆíÀº Å©°Ô Ä¡ÁúÀÇ µÎ²²¿¡ µû¶ó (´ëÁ¶±º, 1 mm, 2 mm) 3°³ÀÇ ±ºÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾úÀ¸¸ç, °¢ ±ºÀº ´Ù½Ã light guideÀÇ Á¾·ù¿Í ±¤Á¶»ç ½Ã°£¿¡ µû¶ó 4°³ÀÇ ±ºÀ¸·Î ³ª´©¾ú´Ù. Á¦ÀÛµÈ ½ÃÆíÀº ¹Ì¼¼°æµµÃøÁ¤±â¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇØ ±¤Á¶»ç¸éÀÇ ºñÄ¿½º °æµµ¸¦ ÃøÁ¤ÇÑ °á°ú, 2 mm Ä¡Áú±º°ú ´ëÁ¶±ºÀÇ Turbo-light guideÀ¸·Î 40ÃÊ µ¿¾È ÁßÇÕÇÑ ½ÃÆíÀÌ °¡Àå ³ôÀº Ç¥¸é °æµµ°ªÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, 2 mm Ä¡Áú±º¿¡¼­ light guideÀÇ Á¾·ù¿¡ »ó°ü¾øÀÌ 20ÃÊ µ¿¾È ÁßÇÕÇÑ ½ÃÆíµéÀÌ °¡Àå ³·Àº Ç¥¸é °æµµ°ªÀ» º¸¿´´Ù (p < 0.05). ÀÌ»óÀÇ °á°ú´Â 1 mm ÀÌÇÏ¿Í °°Àº ¾ãÀº Ä¡ÁúÀ» Åõ°úÇÏ¿© º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀ» ÁßÇÕÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì ±¤¼¼±â¿Í ±¤Á¶»ç ½Ã°£À» Áõ°¡½ÃÅ°¸é ÁßÇÕ Á¤µµµµ Áõ°¡Çϳª, ƯÁ¤ µÎ²² ÀÌ»óÀÇ Ä¡ÁúÀ» Åõ°ú ½Ã ±¤¼¼±â³ª ±¤Á¶»ç ½Ã°£À» Áõ°¡½ÃÅ°´õ¶óµµ ÁßÇÕ Á¤µµÀÇ Áõ°¡´Â ±â´ëÇϱ⠾î·Æ´Ù´Â °ÍÀ» ½Ã»çÇÑ´Ù.

In this study we measured the amount of light energy that was projected through the tooth material and analyzed the degree of polymerization by measuring the surface hardness of composites. For polymerization, Optilux 501 (Demetron, USA) with two types of light guide was used: a 12 mm diameter light guide with 840 nW/$cm^2$ light intensity and a 7 mm diameter turbo light guide with 1100 nW/$cm^2$. Specimens were divided into three groups according to thickness of penetrating tooth (1 mm, 2 mm, 0 mm). Each group was further divided into four subgroups according to type of light guide and curing time (20 seconds, 40 seconds). Vickers¡¯¡¯ hardness was measured by using a microhardness tester. In 0 mm and 1 mm penetrating tooth group, which were polymerized by a turbo light guide for 40 seconds, showed the highest hardness values. The specimens from 2 mm penetrating tooth group, which were polymerized for 20 seconds, demonstrated the lowest hardness regardless of the types of light guides (p < 0.05). The results of this study suggest that, when projecting tooth material over a specified thickness, the increase of polymerization will be limited even if light intensity or curing time is increased.

Å°¿öµå

Á¾ÇÕ·ü;ºñÄ¿½º °æµµ;Ä¡ÁúÀÇ µÎ²²

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI