Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø ¼öº¹¹°ÀÇ ¹Ì¼¼´©Ãâ °¨¼Ò¸¦ À§ÇÑ ·¹Áø Àü»öÁ¦ÀÇ È¿°ú

EFFECT OF RESIN SEALANTS ON THE REDUCTION OF MICROLEAKAGE IN COMPOSITE RESTORATIONS

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Á¸ÇÐȸÁö 2006³â 31±Ç 4È£ p.282 ~ 289
Á¶¿µ°ï, ±è¹®È«, ÀÌ¸í±¸,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Á¶¿µ°ï ( Cho Young-Gon ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
±è¹®È« ( Kim Mun-Hong ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
ÀÌ¸í±¸ ( Lee Myung-Goo ) - Á¶¼±´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº 5±Þ º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø ¼öº¹¹°¿¡ °¢Á¾ ·¹Áø Àü»öÁ¦¸¦ Àû¿ëÇÑ ÈÄ, ¼öº¹¹°ÀÇ ±³ÇÕ¸éÃø°ú Ä¡ÀºÃø º¯¿¬ ¹Ì¼¼´©Ãâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ·¹Áø Àü»öÁ¦ÀÇ °¨¼ÒÈ¿°ú¸¦ Æò°¡Çϱâ À§ÇÏ¿© ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. 40°³ÀÇ ¹ß°ÅµÈ ´ë±¸Ä¡ÀÇ Çù¸é Ä¡°æºÎ¿¡ 5±Þ ¿Íµ¿À» Çü¼ºÇÏ°í º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀ» ÃæÀüÇÑ ÈÄ, »ç¿ëµÈ ·¹Áø Àü»öÁ¦¿¡ µû¶ó ´ÙÀ½ °ú °°ÀÌ 4°³ÀÇ ±ºÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù; º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø Ç¥¸é°ú º¯¿¬ºÎ¿¡ ·¹Áø Àü»öÁ¦¸¦ Àû¿ëÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº ´ëÁ¶±º, º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø Ç¥¸é°ú º¯¿¬ºÎ¿¡ °¢°¢ ·¹Áø Àü»öÁ¦¸¦ Àû¿ëÇÑ Fortify Plus ±º, BisCover ±º ¹× PermaSeal ±ºÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ ±ºÀÇ ½ÃÆíÀ» ½Ç¿ÂÀÇ Áõ·ù¼ö¿¡ 24½Ã°£ µ¿¾È º¸°üÇÑ ÈÄ, 5¡É¿Í 55¡É¿¡¼­ 1,000ȸÀÇ ¿­ ¼øȯÀ» ½ÃÇàÇÏ°í 2% methylene blue ¿ë¾×¿¡ 4½Ã°£µ¿¾È ħÀû½ÃÄ×´Ù. °¢ Ä¡¾Æ´Â Àú¼ÓÀÇ diamond disk ¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °¢ ¼öº¹¹°ÀÇ Á߾Ӻθ¦ µû¶ó Çù, ¼³ ¹æÇâÀ¸·Î ¾çºÐ ÇÏ°í 20¹èÀ²ÀÇ ±¤ÇÐ ÀÔüÇö¹Ì°æ ÇÏ¿¡¼­ °¢°¢ ±³ÇÕ¸éÃø°ú Ä¡ÀºÃø º¯¿¬ ¹Ì¼¼´©ÃâÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. °¢ ±ºÀÇ ±³ÇÕ¸éÃø°ú Ä¡ÀºÃø º¯¿¬ ¹Ì¼¼´©Ãâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ À¯ÀǼºÀ» °ËÁ¤À» ½ÃÇàÇÏ¿© ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á°ú¸¦ ¾ò¾ú´Ù. 1. ±³ÇÕ¸éÃø º¯¿¬ ¹Ì¼¼´©ÃâÀº »ç¿ëµÈ ·¹Áø Àü»öÁ¦ °£¿¡ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»Áö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. 2. Ä¡ÀºÃø º¯¿¬ ¹Ì¼¼´©ÃâÀº ´ëÁ¶±º°ú Fortify Plus ±ºÀÌ PermaSeal ±ºº¸´Ù Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ³ô°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µÀ¸¸ç, ¶ÇÇÑ Fortify Plus ±ºÀº Biscover ±ºº¸´Ù Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ³ôÀº º¯¿¬ ¹Ì¼¼´©ÃâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù (p < 0.05). 3. ´ëÁ¶±º°ú Fortify Plus ±ºÀº ±³ÇÕ¸éÃø º¸´Ù Ä¡ÀºÃø º¯¿¬¿¡¼­ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î ´õ ³ôÀº ¹Ì¼¼´©ÃâÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù (p < 0.05). 4. BisCover ±º°ú PermaSeal ±ºÀº ±³ÇÕ¸éÃø°ú Ä¡ÀºÃøÀÇ º¯¿¬ ¹Ì¼¼´©Ãâ °£¿¡ Åë°èÇÐÀûÀ¸·Î À¯ÀÇÇÑ Â÷À̸¦ ³ªÅ¸³»Áö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. º» ¿¬±¸¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇϸé, 5±Þ º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø ¼öº¹¹°ÀÇ ±³ÇÕ¸éÃø º¯¿¬ ¹Ì¼¼´©Ãâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ·¹Áø Àü»öÁ¦ÀÇ °¨¼ÒÈ¿°ú´Â Å©°Ô ³ªÅ¸³ªÁö ¾Ê¾ÒÁö¸¸, Ä¡ÀºÃø º¯¿¬ ¹Ì¼¼´©Ãâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ·¹Áø Àü»öÁ¦ÀÇ °¨¼ÒÈ¿°ú´Â »ç¿ëµÈ ·¹Áø Àü»öÁ¦¿¡ µû¶ó ¼­·Î ´Ù¸£°Ô ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù.

The purpose of this study was to compare the ability of three resin surface sealants to prevent microleakage in Class V composite resin restorations. Forty Class V cavities with the occlusal margin in enamel and gingival margin in dentin were prepared on the buccal surfaces of sound extracted molars, and restored with composite resin. Restorations were randomly assigned into one of four equal groups (n = 10): a control group, without resin sealing, and three experimental groups in which margins were sealed with Fortify Plus, Biscover and Permaseal, respectively. Specimens were thermocycled, immersed in a 2% methylene blue solution for 4 hours, sectioned longitudinally, and observed the leakage at the occlusal and gingival margins. The result was analyzed using Kruskal-Wallis test, Mann-Whitney test and Wilcoxon signed rank test. In conclusion, the ability to reduce microleakage at occlusal margins was similar in all of three sealants. However at gingival margin, it depended on the type of used resin surface sealant. At gingival margin. control and Fortify Plus group showed statistically higher microleakage than PermaSeal group. and Fortify Plus group also showed higher microleakage than BisCover group (p < 0.05).

Å°¿öµå

º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø ¼öº¹¹°;¹Ì¼¼´©Ãâ;·¹Áø Àü»öÁ¦;±³ÇÕ¸éÃø º¯¿¬;Ä¡ÀºÃø º¯¿¬
Resin surface sealants;Microleakage;Composite resin restorations;Class V cavities;Occlusal margins;Gingival margin

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI