Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°øÃÊÁ¡ ·¹ÀÌÀú ÁÖ»ç Çö¹Ì°æÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ ½ÇÇèÀû ·¹ÁøÀÇ Ç¥¸é Á¶µµ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ¿¬±¸

SURFACE ROUGHNESS OF EXPERIMENTAL COMPOSITE RESINS USING CONFOCAL LASER SCANNING MICROSCOPE

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Á¸ÇÐȸÁö 2008³â 33±Ç 1È£ p.1 ~ 8
¹èÁöÇö, À̹̾Ö, Á¶º´ÈÆ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¹èÁöÇö ( Bae Ji-Hyun ) - ºÐ´ç¼­¿ï´ëÇб³º´¿ø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸°ú
À̹̾֠( Lee Mi-Ae ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
Á¶º´ÈÆ ( Cho Byeong-Hoon ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸´Â °øÃÊÁ¡ Çö¹Ì°æÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© »õ·Î¿î ´Ü·®Ã¼¿Í fillerÀÇ Å©±â, ¿¬¸¶¹æ¹ýÀÌ ½ÇÇè¿ë º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµ¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ¿¬±¸ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ÜÁ¡ÀÌ ¸¹Àº Èñ¼®ÀçÀÎ TEGDMAÀÇ »ç¿ëÀ» ÁÙÀ̱â À§ÇØ, Bis-GMAÀÇ À¯µµÃ¼·Î¼­ ÁßÇÕ¼öÃàÀÌ Àû°í Á¡µµ°¡ ³·Àº »õ·Î¿î ´Ü·®Ã¼ÀÎ methoxlyated Bis-GMA (Bis-M-CMA)¸¦ ÷°¡ÇÏ°í ´Ù¸¥ Å©±âÀÇ filer¸¦ °®´Â 2Á¾ÀÇ ½ÇÇè¿ë º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø°ú TEGDMA¸¦ ÇÔÀ¯ÇÑ 1Á¾ÀÇ ½ÇÇè¿ë º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀ» Á¦ÀÛÇÏ¿´´Ù. EX1; ½ÇÇè¿ë º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø 1 (Bis-M-GMA/TEGDMA = 95/5 wt%, 40 nm ³ª³ëÇÊ·¯ ÇÔÀ¯), EX2; ½ÇÇè¿ë º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø 2 (Bis-M-GMA/TEGDMA = 95/5wt%, 20 nm ³ª³ëÇÊ·¯ ÇÔÀ¯), EX3; ½ÇÇè¿ë º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø 3 (Bis-GMA/TEGDMA = 70/30 wt%, 40 nm ³ª³ëÇÊ·¯ ÇÔÀ¯).
Å×ÇÁ·Ð ¸ôµå¸¦ ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© Áö¸§ 6 mm µÎ²² 2 mmÀÇ ½ÃÆíÀ» °¢ ½ÇÇè¿ë º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø°ú Filtek Z250À¸·Î 9°³¾¿ ¸¸µé°í 3±ºÀ¸·Î ºÐ·ùÇÏ¿´´Ù. Mylar strip ±ºÀº ¿¬¸¶¸¦ ÇÏÁö ¾Ê¾Ò°í, Sof-lex±ºÀº 1000 SiC paper·Î ¿¬¸¶ÇÑ µÚ 501-lex disc·Î ¿¬¸¶ÇÏ¿´´Ù. Diapolisher ±ºÀº 1000 SiC paper·Î ¿¬¸¶ÇÑ µÚ DiaPolisher polishing point·Î ¿¬¸¶ÇÏ¿´´Ù.
°øÃÊÁ¡ Çö¹Ì°æÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© °¢ ½ÃÆí´ç 7±ºµ¥¿¡¼­ Rq (Root mean square roughness), Rv (Valley roughness), Rp (Peak roughness), Rc (2D Roughness), Sc (3D Roughness) °ªÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ¿´°í, Two-way ANOVA¿Í Tukey multiple comparisons test·Î À¯ÀǼöÁØ 0.05·Î Åë°èó¸® ÇÏ¿´´Ù. º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ Á¾·ù (p < 0.001), ¿¬¸¶ ¹æ¹ý (p < 0.001)Àº °¢°¢ ¸ðµÎ Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµ °ª¿¡ ¿µÇâÀ» ¹ÌÄ¡¸ç, º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ Á¾·ù¿Í ¿¬¸¶ ¹æ¹ý °£¿¡´Â ±³È£ ÀÛ¿ëÀÌ °üÂûµÇ¾ú´Ù (p < 0.001).
º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÇ Á¾·ù¿¡ µû¸¥ Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµ´Â EX2°¡ °¡Àå °ÅÄ£ Ç¥¸éÀ» º¸¿´°í, EX3ÀÌ °¡Àå ÆòÈ°ÇÑ ¸éÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç (p < 0.05). ¿¬¸¶ ¹æ¹ý¿¡¼­´Â ¿¬¸¶ÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº Mylar strip ±ºÀÌ °¡Àå ÆòÈ°ÇÑ ¸éÀ» Çü¼ºÇÏ¿´´Ù (p < 0.05).
º» ¿¬±¸ °á°ú¸¦ Á¾ÇÕÇÏ¿©º¸¸é ¿¬¸¶ÇÏÁö ¾Ê°í Mylar stripÇÏ¿¡¼­ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÌ ÁßÇÕµÈ °æ¿ì °¡Àå ³·Àº Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµ¿Í ÆòÈ°ÇÑ Ç¥¸éÀ» º¸¿´À¸¸ç, »õ·Î¿î ·¹Áø ´Ü·®Ã¼ÀÎ Bis-M-GMA¸¦ ÇÔÀ¯ÇÑ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀÌ ¼öº¹¹°ÀÇ Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµ Ãø¸é¿¡¼­´Â ÇÊ·¯ Å©±â¿¡ °ü°è¾øÀÌ ±âÁ¸ÀÇ Bis-GMA/TEGDMA¸¦ ±âÁú´Ü·®Ã¼·Î »ç¿ëÇÏ´Â º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø¿¡ ºñ±³ÇÏ¿© ¿ì¼öÇÏÁö ¸øÇÑ °ÍÀ» È®ÀÎÇÏ¿´´Ù.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of a new resin monomer, filler size and polishing technique on the surface roughness of composite resin restorations using confocal laser scanning microscopy. By adding new methoxylated Bis-GMA (Bis-M-GMA, 2,2-bis[4-(2-methoxy-3-methacryloyloxy propoxy) phenyl] propane) having low viscosity, the content of TEGDMA might be decreased. Three experimental composite resins were made: EX1 (Bis-M-GMA/TEGDMA = 95/5 wt%, 40 nm nanofillers); EX2 (Bis-M-GMA/TEGDMA = 95/5 wt%, 20 nm nanofillers); EX3 (Bis-GMA/TEGDMA = 70/30 wt%, 40 nm nanofillers). Filtek Z250 was used as a reference.
Nine specimens (6 mm in diameter and 2 mm in thickness) for each experimental composite resin and Filtek Z250 were fabricated in a teflon mold and assigned to three groups. In Mylar strip group, specimens were left undisturbed. In Sof-lex group, specimens were ground with 1000 SiC paper and polished with Sof-lex discs. In DiaPolisher group, specimens were ground with 1000 SiC paper and polished with DiaPolisher polishing points. The Ra (Average roughness), Rq (Root mean square roughness), Rv (Valley roughness), Rp (Peak roughness), Rc (2D roughness) and Sc (3D roughness) values were determined using confocal laser scanning microscopy. The data were statistically analyzed by Two-way ANOVA and Tukey multiple comparisons test (p = 0.05).
The type of composite resin and polishing technique significantly affected the surface roughness of the composite resin restorations (p < 0.001). EX3 showed the smoothest surface compared to the other composite resins (p < 0.05). Mylar strip resulted in smoother surface than other polishing techniques (p < 0.05).
Bis-M-GMA. a new resin monomer having low viscosity, might reduce the amount of diluent, but showed adverse effect on the surface roughness of composite resin restorations.

Å°¿öµå

Ç¥¸éÁ¶µµ;»õ·Î¿î ·¹Áø ´Ü·®Ã¼;ÇÊ·¯ Å©±â;°øÃÊÁ¡ ·¹ÀÌÀú ÁÖ»ç Çö¹Ì°æ
Bis-M-GMA;confocal laser scanning microscopy;filler size;new resin monomer;surface roughness

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI