Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

¹Ýº¹ ±ÁÈû ½ºÆ®·¹½º ÇÏ¿¡¼­ Àüµ¿½Ä ´ÏÄÌ-ƼŸ´½ ÆÄÀÏÀÇ ´Ü¸éÀûÀÇ Å©±â°¡ ÇÇ·ÎÆÄÀý¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâ : ÆÄÀý¿ªÇÐ ºÐ¼®

EFFECT OF CROSS-SECTIONAL AREA OF 6 NICKEL-TITANIUM ROTARY INSTRUMENTS ON THE FATIGUE FRACTURE UNDER CYCLIC FLEXURAL STRESS: A FRACTOGRAPHIC ANALYSIS

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Á¸ÇÐȸÁö 2009³â 34±Ç 5È£ p.424 ~ 429
Ȳ¼ö¿¬, ¿À¼Ò¶÷, ÀÌÀ±, ÀÓ»ó¹Î, ±Ý±â¿¬,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
Ȳ¼ö¿¬ ( Hwang Soo-Youn ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
¿À¼Ò¶÷ ( Oh So-Ram ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
ÀÌÀ± ( Lee Yoon ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
ÀÓ»ó¹Î ( Lim Sang-Min ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
±Ý±â¿¬ ( Kum Kee-Yeon ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡ÀÇÇבּ¸¼Ò

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸ÀÇ ¸ñÀûÀº ´ÏÄÌ Æ¼Å¸´½ Àüµ¿ÆÄÀÏÀÇ ÇÇ·Î ÆÄÀý¿¡ ÆÄÀÏÀÇ ´Ü¸é ÇüÅ°¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» Æò°¡ÇÏ°íÀÚ ÇÏ¿´´Ù. 6 Á¾ÀÇ ProFile (Dentsply), Mtwo (VDW), K3 (SybronEndo), HeroShaper (MicroMega), NRT (Mani), Alpha system (KOMET) ´ÏÄÌ-ƼŸ´½ Àüµ¿ ÆÄÀÏ(ISO 30 size/.04 taper)À» °¢ 10°³¾¿ ½ÇÇ豺À¸·Î ¹èÁ¤ÇÏ°í ½ÇÇèÀ» ÁøÇàÇÏ¿´´Ù. ´ÏÄÌ Æ¼Å¸´½ Àüµ¿ÆÄÀÏ¿¡ ¹Ýº¹ÀûÀÎ Àå·Â°ú ¾ÐÃà·ÂÀ» ÀçÇö½Ãų ¼ö ÀÖ´Â ÇÇ·ÎÆÄÀý ½ÇÇè±â(Denbotix)¿Í ¿¬°áµÈ ÅäÅ© Á¶Àý Àüµ¿¸ðÅÍ(Aseptico)¿¡ °¢ ±ºÀÇ ÆÄÀÏÀ» ¿¬°áÇÏ¿© 300rpm ¼Óµµ·Î ¸¸°îµµ°¡ 60µµÀÌ°í 5mm ÀÇ ¹Ý°æÀ» °¡Áø Àΰø ±Ý¼Ó ±Ù°ü ³»¸¦ 6 mm pecking depth ·Î ÀÛµ¿½ÃÄ×´Ù. °¢ ÆÄÀÏÀÇ ÆÄÀý½Ã°£À» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ°í Åë°è ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿© À¯ÀǼºÀ» ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, °¢ ±ºÀÇ ÆÄÀýµÈ ¸ðµç ÆÄÀÏÀÇ ÆÄÀý¸éÀ» ÁÖ»çÀüÀÚÇö¹Ì°æÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÑ fractographic analysis¸¦ ÅëÇØ ÆÄÀý ¿ªÇÐÀ» ±Ô¸íÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¶ÇÇÑ °¢ ±º¿¡¼­ 3 °³ÀÇ »ç¿ëÇÏÁö ¾ÊÀº »õ ÆÄÀÏÀ» clear resin ¿¡ ¸Å¸ôÇÏ°í tip¿¡¼­ºÎÅÍ 3mm ÁöÁ¡À» ȾÀý´ÜÇÏ¿© Image-Pro Plus (Imagej 1.34n, NIH) ¼ÒÇÁÆ®¿þ¾î·Î Àý´Ü¸éÀÇ ´Ü¸éÀûÀ» ÃøÁ¤ÇÏ°í ´Ü¸éÀûÀÇ Å©±â¿Í ÇÇ·Î ÆÄÀý°úÀÇ »ó°ü¼ºµµ Æò°¡ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ½ÇÇè °á°ú NRT¿Í ProFileÀÌ ´Ù¸¥ ½ÇÇ豺¿¡ ºñÇؼ­ À¯ÀǼº ÀÖ°Ô ³ôÀº ÇÇ·Î ÆÄÀý ÀúÇ×¼ºÀ» º¸¿´´Ù (P < .05). ¶ÇÇÑ ÆÄÀÏÀÇ ´Ü¸éÀûÀº ÇÇ·ÎÆÄÀý ÀúÇ×¼º°ú Åë°èÇÐÀûÀÎ À¯ÀǼºÀº º¸ÀÌÁö ¾Ê¾Ò´Ù. Fractographic analysis °á°ú ¸ðµç ½ÃÆí¿¡¼­ ÆÄÀý¸éÀº ductile fracture¿Í brittle fracture°¡ È¥ÀçµÈ ¾ç»óÀ¸·Î ³ªÅ¸³µ´Ù. °á·ÐÀûÀ¸·Î ´ÏÄÌ Æ¼Å¸´½ Àüµ¿ ÆÄÀÏÀÇ ´Ü¸éÀûÀÇ Å©±â´Â ÇÇ·ÎÆÄÀý ÀúÇ×°ú´Â »ó°ü¼ºÀÌ Àû¾ú´Ù.

This study aimed to assess the influence of different cross-sectional area on the cyclic fatigue fracture of Ni-Ti rotary files using a fatigue tester incorporating cyclical axial movement. Six brands of Ni-Ti rotary files (ISO 30 size with .04 taper) of 10 each were tested: Alpha system (KOMET), HeroShaper (MicroMega), K3 (SybronEndo), Mtwo (VDW), NRT (Mani), and ProFile (Dentsply). A fatigue-tester (Denbotix) was designed to allow cyclic tension and compressive stress on the tip of the instrument. Each file was mounted on a torque controlled motor (Aseptico) using a 1:20 reduction contra-angle and was rotated at 300 rpm with a continuous, 6 mm axial oscillating motion inside an artificial steel canal. The canal had a 60?angle and a 5 mm radius of curvature. Instrument fracture was visually detected and the time until fracture was recorded by a digital stop watch. The data were analyzed statistically. Fractographic analysis of all fractured surfaces was performed to determine the fracture modes using a scanning electron microscope. Cross-sectional area at 3 mm from the tip of 3 unused Ni-Ti instruments for each group was calculated using Image-Pro Plus (Imagej 1.34n, NIH). Results showed that NRT and ProFile had significantly longer time to fracture compared to the other groups (p < .05). The cross-sectional area was not significantly associated with fatigue resistance. Fractographycally, all fractured surfaces demonstrated a combination of ductile and brittle fracture. In conclusion, there was no significant relationship between fatigue resistance and the cross-sectional area of Ni-Ti instruments under experimental conditions.

Å°¿öµå

Àΰø ±Ý¼Ó±Ù°ü;´Ü¸éÇüÅÂ;ÇÇ·ÎÆÄÀý ÀúÇ×¼º;ÆÄÀý¿ªÇÐ ºÐ¼®
artificial steel canal; cross-sectional area;fatigue resistance;fractographic analysis

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI