Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

µµÀç ¶ó¹Ì³×ÀÌÆ®¿Í º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø ¼öº¹ ½Ã Ä¡°£ÀÌ°³ ¾ç¿¡ µû¸¥ Á¢Âø°è¸éÀÇ ÀÀ·ÂºÐÆ÷¿¡ °üÇÑ 3Â÷¿ø À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¹ýÀû ¿¬±¸

THE EFFECT OF THE AMOUNT OF INTERDENTAL SPACING ON THE STRESS DISTRIBUTION IN MAXILLARY CENTRAL INCISORS RESTORED WITH PORCELAIN LAMINATE VENEER AND COMPOSITE RESIN: A 3D-FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS

´ëÇÑÄ¡°úº¸Á¸ÇÐȸÁö 2010³â 35±Ç 1È£ p.30 ~ 39
È«Áعè, Ź½Â¹Î, ¹é½ÂÈ£, Á¶º´ÈÆ,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
È«Áعè ( Hong Jun-Bae ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
Ź½Â¹Î ( Tak Seung-Min ) - °æ»ó´ëÇб³ °ø°ú´ëÇÐ ±â°èÇ×°øÇаú
¹é½ÂÈ£ ( Baek Seung-Ho ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç
Á¶º´ÈÆ ( Cho Byung-Hoon ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡ÀÇÇдëÇпø Ä¡°úº¸Á¸Çб³½Ç

Abstract

º» ¿¬±¸¿¡¼­´Â, »ïÂ÷¿ø À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒºÐ¼®¹ýÀ» ÀÌ¿ëÇÏ¿© º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø ¹× µµÀç ¶ó¹Ì³×ÀÌÆ®·Î ÀüÄ¡ºÎ Ä¡°£ÀÌ°³¸¦ Æó¼âÇÒ ¶§, Ä¡°£ÀÌ°³ÀÇ °£°Ý°ú ¼öº¹¹æ¹ýÀÌ ¼öº¹¹°ÀÇ Á¢Âø°è¸é¿¡¼­ÀÇ ÀÀ·ÂºÐÆ÷¿¡ ¹ÌÄ¡´Â ¿µÇâÀ» ºñ±³ÇÏ¿´´Ù. º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø ȤÀº µµÀç ¶ó¹Ì³×ÀÌÆ®·Î ¼öº¹µÈ ¸ð½ÀÀÇ À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼Ò¸ðµ¨À» Çü¼ºÇÏ¿© Á¢Âø°è¸é¿¡¼­ÀÇ von Mises stress ºÐÆ÷ ¾çŸ¦ ºÐ¼®ÇÏ¿´´Ù. ¼öº¹ÇüÅ´ ũ°Ô ³× °¡Áö ¹üÁÖ¸¦ °í·ÁÇÏ¿´´Ù. Type I, º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀ¸·Î ÀÎÁ¢¸éÀ» ÃÖ¼ÒÇÑÀ¸·Î ¼öº¹ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì; Type II, Ä¡¾Æ »èÁ¦ ¾øÀÌ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀ¸·Î ¼ø¸éÀÇ Àý¹Ý±îÁö ¼öº¹ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì; Type III, Ä¡¾Æ »èÁ¦ ÈÄ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀ¸·Î ¼ø¸éÀÇ 2/3±îÁö ¼öº¹ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì; Type IV, µµÀç ¶ó¹Ì³×ÀÌÆ®·Î ¼öº¹ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ì ÀÌ ½ÇÇèÀÇ ÇÑ°è ³»¿¡¼­ ´ÙÀ½°ú °°Àº °á·ÐÀ» ³»¸± ¼ö ÀÖ¾ú´Ù. ¸ðµç ¼öº¹ÇüÅ¿¡ ´ëÇØ Ä¡°£ÀÌ°³ °£°ÝÀÌ ³Ð¾îÁú¼ö·Ï Á¢Âø°è¸é¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ÃÖ´ëÀÀ·Â°ªÀº Áõ°¡ÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, µµÀç ¶ó¹Ì³×ÀÌÆ®·Î Ä¡°£ÀÌ°³ ºÎÀ§¸¦ ¼öº¹ÇÑ °æ¿ì(Type IV)°¡ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀ¸·Î ¼öº¹ÇÑ°æ¿ì(Type I, II, III)¿¡ ºñÇØ ³ôÀº ÃÖ´ëÀÀ·Â°ªÀ» ³ªÅ¸³»¾ú´Ù. ±×·¯³ª Ä¡°£ÀÌ°³ °£°ÝÀÌ ³Ð¾îÁú¼ö·Ï µµÀç ¶ó¹Ì³×ÀÌÆ®¿Í º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø¿¡¼­ ¹ß»ýÇÏ´Â ÃÖ´ëÀÀ·Â°ªÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ´Â °¨¼ÒÇÏ¿´À¸¸ç, Ä¡°£ÀÌ°³ °£°ÝÀÇ Áõ°¡¿¡ µû¸¥ ÃÖ´ëÀÀ·Â°ªÀÇ Áõ°¡À²Àº µµÀç ¶ó¹Ì³×ÀÌÆ®°¡ º¹ÇÕ·¹ÁøÀ¸·Î ¼öº¹ÇÏ´Â °æ¿ìº¸´Ù ³·¾Ò´Ù.

This study evaluated the influence of the type of restoration and the amount of interdental spacing on the stress distribution in maxillary central incisors restored by means of porcelain laminate veneers and direct composite resin restorations. Three-dimensional finite element models were fabricated to represent different types of restorations. Four clinical situations were considered. Type I, closing diastema using composite resin. Labial border of composite resin was extended just enough to cover the interdental space; Type II, closing diastema using composite resin without reduction of labial surface. Labial border of composite resin was extended distally to cover the half of the total labial surface; Type III, closing diastema using composite resin with reduction of labial surface. Labial border of the preparation and restored composite resin was extended distally twothirds of the total labial surface; Type IV, closing diastema using porcelain laminate veneer with a feathered- edge preparation technique. Four different interdental spaces (1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 mm) were applied for each type of restorations. For all types of restoration, adding the width of free extension of the porcelain laminate veneer and composite resin increased the stress occurred at the bonding layer. The maximum stress values observed at the bonding layer of Type IV were higher than that of Type I, II and III. However, the increasing rate of maximum stress value of Type IV was lower than that of Type I, II and III. [J Kor Acad Cons Dent 35(1):30-39, 2010]

Å°¿öµå

3Â÷¿ø À¯ÇÑ¿ä¼ÒºÐ¼®¹ý;Ä¡°£ÀÌ°³;µµÀç ¶ó¹Ì³×ÀÌÆ®;º¹ÇÕ·¹Áø;Á¢Âø°è¸é;ÀÀ·ÂºÐÆ÷
Three dimensional-finite element analysis;Interdental space;Porcelain laminate veneer;Composite resin;Bonding layer;Stress distribution -Received 2009.12.30.; revised 2010.1.4.; accepted 2010.1.4.-

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

 

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI