°æ±¸±â°ü»ð°ü¹ý°ú °æºñ±â°ü»ð°ü¹ýÀÇ ½ÉÇ÷°ü°è ¿µÇâ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ºñ±³
A Comparison of Cardiovascular Effects Between Orotracheal Intubation and Nasotracheal Intubation
ÃÖ¿µ±Ô, ±èµ¿¿Á,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
ÃÖ¿µ±Ô ( Choi Young-Kyu ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¸¶ÃëÅëÁõÀÇÇб³½Ç
±èµ¿¿Á ( Kim Dong-Ok ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ ¸¶ÃëÅëÁõÀÇÇб³½Ç
KMID : 0980220010010010010
Abstract
Background: The prospective study was designed to compare the cardiovascular response to endotracheal insertion of either an orotracheal tube or a nasotracheal tube.
Methods: 120 ASA physical status I and II surgical patients requiring general anesthesia and tracheal intubation were studied and assigned to two groups: orotracheal group (n=60) and nasotracheal intubation group (n=60). Patients were premedicated with midazolam 0.05 mg/kg and glycopyrrolate 0.005 mg/kg intramuscularly and anesthesia was induced with thiopental sodium 5 mg/kg and succinylcholine 0.1 mg/kg intravenously. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were assessed noninvasively before induction of anesthesia and immediately after intubation, 1 min, 2 min, 3 min, and 5 min after intubation.
Results: Cardiovascular responses such as SBP, DBP, MAP and HR were similar for both techniques and no significant differences between two groups were observed until 5 min after intubation.
Conclusions: In healthy ASA I and II patients with normal blood pressure, induction doses of thiopental sodium 5 mg/kg and succinylcholine 0.1 mg/kg didn¡¯t attenuated the cardiovascular response to laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation. Insertion of an endotracheal tube may be the most invasive stimulus during intubation procedures. (JKDSA 2001; 1: 10~15
Å°¿öµå
Intubation technique; nasotracheal; orotracheal; Monitoring; blood pressure; heart rate
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸