±¸°¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú ȯÀÚÀÇ Àü½Å ¸¶Ãë¿¡ ÀÖ¾î¼ ÈíÀÔ ¸¶Ãë¿Í Á¤¸Æ ¸¶ÃëÀÇ Â÷ÀÌ¿¡ ´ëÇÑ ÀÓ»óÀû °íÂû
A Clinical Study about Comparison of Inhalation Anesthesia and Intravenous Anesthesia in Oral and Maxillofacial Patients
±èÁø, À̹ÌÁ¤, ¼ÛÇöö,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
±èÁø ( Kim Jin ) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç ±¸°¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
À̹ÌÁ¤ ( Lee Mi-Joung ) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ÀÇ°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°úÇб³½Ç ±¸°¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
¼ÛÇöö ( Song Hyun-Chul ) - °¡Å縯´ëÇб³ ¼ººó¼¾Æ®º´¿ø Ä¡°ú ±¸°¾Ç¾È¸é¿Ü°ú
KMID : 0980220020020010015
Abstract
Intravenous anesthesia was compared with inhalation anesthesia in 20 patients of oral and maxillofacial surgery. The patients were randomly assigned to two treatment groups so that 20 patients were injected ketamine and propofol and 20 patients were administered enflurane.
The hemodynamic responses of patients and recovery profile of the two groups were compared.
Intravenous anesthesia group awoke significantly faster than inhalation anesthesia after operation.
Time to full recovery in intravenous anesthesia group was significantly shorter than that of inhalation anesthesia group.
We conclude that intravenous anesthesia is a practical technique for oral and maxillofacial surgery patients and intravenous anesthesia may be more preferable because of the significant shortness of recovery time.
Å°¿öµå
Enflurane; Intravenous anesthesia; Inhalation anesthesia; Ketamine; Propofol
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸