Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

°æºñ±â°ü ³» »ð°ü ½Ã Á ¿ìÃø ºñ°ø ¼±Åÿ¡¼­ ºñÃâÇ÷ ¹× Æ©ºê ÁøÀÔ ½ÇÆÐ ºóµµ¿¡ °üÇÑ ¿¬±¸

The Clinical Study for Epistaxis and Tube Insertion Failure Incidence on the Choice of Nostril during Nasotracheal Intubation

´ëÇÑÄ¡°ú¸¶Ãë°úÇÐȸÁö 2005³â 5±Ç 2È£ p.107 ~ 111
¼­±¤¼®, ÁÖ¸®¾Æ, °í½ÂÁö, ±èÇöÁ¤, ¿°±¤¿ø,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
¼­±¤¼® ( Seo Kwang-Suk ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°úº´¿ø ¸¶ÃëÅëÁõÀÇÇаú
ÁÖ¸®¾Æ ( Joo Ri-Ah ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¸¶Ãë°úÇб³½Ç
°í½ÂÁö ( Ko Seung-Ji ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¸¶Ãë°úÇб³½Ç
±èÇöÁ¤ ( Kim Hyun-Jeong ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¸¶Ãë°úÇб³½Ç
¿°±¤¿ø ( Yeom Kwang-Won ) - ¼­¿ï´ëÇб³ Ä¡°ú´ëÇÐ Ä¡°ú¸¶Ãë°úÇб³½Ç

Abstract


Background: Nasotracheal intubation for general anesthesia is preferred for many oral and maxillofacial procedures because it ensures unhindered access to the operative site. Epistaxis and tube insertion failures are recognized complications of nasotracheal intubation. The aim of our study was to elucidate whether the nostril side used influenced epistaxis and insertion failure incidence.

Methods: We studied 434 patients undergoing nasal intubation (July 2004- February 2005) with permission. Randomly, one side of nostril was selected with chart ID number. During nasotracheal intubation, epistaxis severity and tube insertion failure was observed by the anesthesiologist who inserted nasotracheal tube.

Results: There was no significant difference between either nostril in epistaxis severity (chi-square test P = 0.860) and in the incidence of insertion failure (P = 0.867).

Conclusions: In this study, both nostrils showed equal epistaxis and insertion failure incidence.

Å°¿öµå

Epistaxis; Nasotracheal intubation; Nostril; Tube insertion failure

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI