Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Microshear bond strength of dual-cure resin cement in zirconia after different cleaning techniques: an in vitro study

Journal of Advanced Prosthodontics 2021³â 13±Ç 4È£ p.237 ~ 245
Atoche-Socola Katherine Joselyn, Arriola-Guillen Luis Ernesto, Lopez-Flores Ana Isabel, Garcia Isadora Martini, Huertas-Mogollon Gustavo, Collares Fabricio Mezzomo, Leitune Vicente Castelo Branco,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Atoche-Socola Katherine Joselyn ) - Universidad Cientifica del Sur School of Dentistry Division of Oral Rehabilitation
 ( Arriola-Guillen Luis Ernesto ) - Universidad Cientifica del Sur School of Dentistry Division of Orthodontic
 ( Lopez-Flores Ana Isabel ) - Universidad Cientifica del Sur School of Dentistry Division of Oral Rehabilitation
 ( Garcia Isadora Martini ) - Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Dentistry Dental Materials Laboratory
 ( Huertas-Mogollon Gustavo ) - Universidad Cientifica del Sur School of Dentistry Division of Oral Rehabilitation
 ( Collares Fabricio Mezzomo ) - Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Dentistry Dental Materials Laboratory
 ( Leitune Vicente Castelo Branco ) - Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul School of Dentistry Dental Materials Laboratory

Abstract


PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the microshear bond strength (¥ìSBS) of dual-cure resin cement in CAD-CAM zirconia after different cleaning techniques.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty discs of zirconia-based ceramic from Ivoclar Vivadent were embedded in acrylic resin. The discs were divided into five groups according to the cleaning methods used: Group 1: drying with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3; Group 2: washed with water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3; Group 3: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 + zirconium oxide (Ivoclean); Group 4: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 + potassium hydroxide (Zirclean); and Group 5: washed with distilled water and dried with spraying + sandblasting with Al2O3 + 1% NaClO. All of the groups were contaminated with artificial saliva for 1 minute and then cleaned. Statistical analyses were performed using ANOVA and Tukey¡¯s tests.

RESULTS: There were statistically significant differences among all groups for ¥ìSBS (P < .05). The group treated with zirconium oxide (Group 3) showed the highest ¥ìSBS (18.75 ¡¾ 0.23 MPa).

CONCLUSION: When applied to zirconia, the cleaning methods affected the bonding with resin cement differently.

Å°¿öµå

Zirconia; Ceramics; Dental cements; Cleaning; Mechanical test

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed