Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Evaluation of alveolar bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate patients using a computer-aided diagnosis system

Imaging Science in Dentistry 2012³â 42±Ç 4È£ p.225 ~ 229
Sutthiprapaporn Pipop, Tanimoto Keiji, Nakamoto Takashi, Kongsomboon Supaporn, Limmonthol Saowaluck, Pisek Poonsak, Keinprasit Chutimaporn,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Sutthiprapaporn Pipop ) - Thailand Khon Kaen University Department of Oral Diagnosis
 ( Tanimoto Keiji ) - Japan Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
 ( Nakamoto Takashi ) - Japan Hiroshima University Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
 ( Kongsomboon Supaporn ) - Thailand Khon Kaen University Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
 ( Limmonthol Saowaluck ) - Thailand Khon Kaen University Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
 ( Pisek Poonsak ) - Thailand Khon Kaen University Department of Orthodontics
 ( Keinprasit Chutimaporn ) - Thailand Khon Kaen University Department of Orthodontics

Abstract


Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the trabecular bone changes after alveolar bone grafting in unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) patients using a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system. Materials and Methods: The occlusal radiographs taken from 50 UCLP patients were surveyed retrospectively. The images were categorized as: 50 images in group 0 (before bone grafting), 33 images in group 1 (one month after bone grafting), 24 images in group 2 (2-4 months after bone grafting), 15 images in group 3 (5-7 months after bone grafting), and 21 images in group 4 (8 or more months after bone grafting). Each image was grouped as either "non-cleft side" or "cleft side". The CAD system was used five times for each side to calculate the pixel area based on the mathematical morphology. Significant differences were found using a Wilcoxon signed ranks test or paired samples t test. Results: The pixel area showed a significant difference between the "non-cleft side" and "cleft side" in group 0 (404.27¡¾103.72/117.73¡¾92.25; p=0.00), group 1 (434.29¡¾86.70/388.31¡¾109.51; p=0.01), and group 4 (430.98¡¾98.11/366.71¡¾154.59; p=0.02). No significant differences were found in group 2 (423.57¡¾98.12/383.47¡¾135.88; p=0.06) or group 3 (433.02¡¾116.07/384.16¡¾146.55; p=0.19). Conclusion: Based on the design of this study, alveolar bone grafting was similar to normal bone within 2-7 months postoperatively.

Å°¿öµå

Grafting; Bone; Radiography; Dental; Diagnosis; Computer-Assisted

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed