Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Assessment of the efficiency of a pre- versus post-acquisition metal artifact reduction algorithm in the presence of 3 different dental implant materials using multiple CBCT settings: An in vitro study

Imaging Science in Dentistry 2021³â 51±Ç 1È£ p.1 ~ 7
Shahmirzadi Solaleh, Sharaf Rana A., Saadat Sarang, Moore William S., Geha Hassem, Tamimi Dania, Kocasarac Husniye Demirturk,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Shahmirzadi Solaleh ) - Texas A&M College of Dentistry Department of Diagnostic Sciences
 ( Sharaf Rana A. ) - University of Texas Health Science Center Department of Comprehensive Dentistry
 ( Saadat Sarang ) - University of Texas Health Science Center Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery
 ( Moore William S. ) - University of Texas Health Science Center Department of Comprehensive Dentistry
 ( Geha Hassem ) - University of Texas Health Science Center Department of Comprehensive Dentistry
 ( Tamimi Dania ) - Private practice
 ( Kocasarac Husniye Demirturk ) - Marquette University School of Dentistry Department of General Dental Sciences

Abstract


Purpose: The aim of this study was to assess artifacts generated in cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) of 3 types of dental implants using 3 metal artifact reduction (MAR) algorithm conditions (pre-acquisition MAR, postacquisition MAR, and no MAR), and 2 peak kilovoltage (kVp) settings.

Materials and Methods: Titanium-zirconium, titanium, and zirconium alloy implants were placed in a dry mandible. CBCT images were acquired using 84 and 90 kVp and at normal resolution for all 3 MAR conditions. The images were analyzed using ImageJ software (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD) to calculate the intensity of artifacts for each combination of material and settings. A 3-factor analysis of variance model with up to 3-way interactions was used to determine whether there was a statistically significant difference in the mean intensity of artifacts associated with each factor.

Results: The analysis of all 3 MAR conditions showed that using no MAR resulted in substantially more severe artifacts than either of the 2 MAR algorithms for the 3 implant materials; however, there were no significant differences between pre- and post-acquisition MAR. The 90 kVp setting generated less intense artifacts on average than the 84 kVp setting. The titanium-zirconium alloy generated significantly less intense artifacts than zirconium. Titanium generated artifacts at an intermediate level relative to the other 2 implant materials, but was not statistically significantly different from either.

Conclusion: This in vitro study suggests that artifacts can be minimized by using a titanium-zirconium alloy at the 90 kVp setting, with either MAR setting.

Å°¿öµå

Cone-Beam Computed Tomography; Artifacts; Dental Implants

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed