Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Impact of viewing conditions on the performance assessment of different computer monitors used for dental diagnostics

Imaging Science in Dentistry 2021³â 51±Ç 2È£ p.137 ~ 148
Hastie Thomas, Venske-Parker Sascha, Aps Johan K. M.,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Hastie Thomas ) - University of Western Australia Dental School and Oral Health Centre of Western Australia
 ( Venske-Parker Sascha ) - University of Western Australia Dental School and Oral Health Centre of Western Australia
 ( Aps Johan K. M. ) - Artevelde University of Applied Sciences School of Oral Hygiene

Abstract


Purpose: This study aimed to assess the computer monitors used for analysis and interpretation of digital radiographs within the clinics of the Oral Health Centre of Western Australia.

Materials and Methods: In total, 135 computer monitors (3 brands, 6 models) were assessed by analysing the same radiographic image of a combined 13-step aluminium step wedge and the Artinis CDDent 1.0¢ç (Artinis Medical Systems B.V.¢ç, Elst, the Netherlands) test object. The number of steps and cylindrical objects observed on each monitor was recorded along with the monitor¡¯s make, model, position relative to the researcher¡¯s eye level, and proximity to the nearest window. The number of window panels blocked by blinds, the outside weather conditions, and the number of ceiling lights over the surgical suite/cubicle were also recorded. MedCalc¢ç version 19.2.1 (MedCalc Software Ltd¢ç, Ostend, Belgium, https://www.medcalc.org; 2020) was used for statistical analyses (Kruskal-Wallis test and stepwise regression analysis). The level of significance was set at P<0.05.

Results: Stepwise regression analysis showed that only the monitor brand and proximity of the monitor to a window had a significant impact on the monitor¡¯s performance (P<0.05). The Kruskal-Wallis test showed significant differences (P<0.05) in monitor performance for all variables investigated, except for the weather and the clinic in which the monitors were placed.

Conclusion: The vast performance variation present between computer monitors implies the need for a review of monitor selection, calibration, and viewing conditions.

Å°¿öµå

Dental Digital Radiography; Diagnostic Imaging

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

   

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed