Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Effect of posterior span length on the trueness and precision of 3 intraoral digital scanners: A comparative 3-dimensional in vitro study

Imaging Science in Dentistry 2021³â 51±Ç 4È£ p.399 ~ 406
Fattouh Mohamed, Kenawi Laila Mohamed Mohamed, Fattouh Hesham,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Fattouh Mohamed ) - Cairo University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Fixed Prosthodontics
 ( Kenawi Laila Mohamed Mohamed ) - Cairo University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Endodontics
 ( Fattouh Hesham ) - Cairo University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Oral Surgery

Abstract


Purpose: This in vitro study measured and compared 3 intraoral scanners¡¯ accuracy (trueness and precision) with different span lengths.

Materials and Methods: Three master casts were prepared to simulate 3 different span lengths (fixed partial dentures with 3, 4, and 5 units). Each master cast was scanned once with an E3 lab scanner and 10 times with each of the 3 intraoral scanners (Trios 3, Planmeca Emerald, and Primescan AC). Data were stored as Standard Tessellation Language (STL) files. The differences between measurements were compared 3-dimensionally using metrology software. Data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance with post hoc analysis by the Tukey honest significant difference test for trueness and precision. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05.

Results: A statistically significant difference was found between the 3 intraoral scanners in trueness and precision (P<0.05). Primescan AC showed the lowest trueness and precision values (36.8 ¥ìm and 42.0 ¥ìm; (39.4 ¥ìm and 51.2 ¥ìm; and 54.9 ¥ìm and 52.7 ¥ìm) followed by Trios 3 (38.9 ¥ìm and 53.5 ¥ìm; 49.9 ¥ìm and 59.1 ¥ìm; and 58.1 ¥ìm and 64.5 ¥ìm) and Planmeca Emerald (60.4 ¥ìm and 63.6 ¥ìm; 61.3 ¥ìm and 69.0 ¥ìm; and 70.8 ¥ìm and 74.3 ¥ìm) for the 3-unit, 4-unit, and 5-unit fixed partial dentures, respectively.

Conclusion: Primescan AC had the best trueness and precision, followed by Trios 3 and Planmeca Emerald. Increasing span length reduced the trueness and precession of the 3 scanners; however, their values were within the accepted successful ranges.

Å°¿öµå

Image Processing, Computer-Assisted; Imaging, three-dimensional; Dental Abutments

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed