Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Influence of receiver bandwidth on MRI artifacts caused by orthodontic brackets composed of different alloys

Imaging Science in Dentistry 2021³â 51±Ç 4È£ p.413 ~ 419
Abdala-Junior Reinaldo, No-Cortes Juliana, Arita Emiko Saito, Ackerman Jerome L., da Silva Renan Lucio Berbel, ±èÁØÈ£, Cortes Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Abdala-Junior Reinaldo ) - University of Sao Paulo School of Dentistry Department of Oral Radiology
 ( No-Cortes Juliana ) - University of Malta Faculty of Dental Surgery Department of Dental Surgery
 ( Arita Emiko Saito ) - University of Sao Paulo School of Dentistry Department of Oral Radiology
 ( Ackerman Jerome L. ) - Massachusetts General Hospital Department of Radiology
 ( da Silva Renan Lucio Berbel ) - University of Sao Paulo School of Dentistry Department of Oral Radiology
±èÁØÈ£ ( Kim Jun-Ho ) - University of Sao Paulo School of Dentistry Department of Oral Radiology
 ( Cortes Arthur Rodriguez Gonzalez ) - University of Sao Paulo School of Dentistry Department of Oral Radiology

Abstract


Purpose: The aim of this in vitro study was to assess the role of bandwidth on the area of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) artifacts caused by orthodontic appliances composed of different alloys, using different pulse sequences in 1.5 T and 3.0 T magnetic fields.

Materials and Methods: Different phantoms containing orthodontic brackets (ceramic, ceramic bracket with a stainless-steel slot, and stainless steel) were immersed in agar gel and imaged in 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI scanners. Pairs of gradient-echo (GE), spin-echo (SE), and ultrashort echo time (UTE) pulse sequences were used differing in bandwidth only. The area of artifacts from orthodontic devices was automatically estimated from pixel value thresholds within a region of interest (ROI). Mean values for similar pulse sequences differing in bandwidth were compared at 1.5 T and 3.0 T using analysis of variance.

Results: The comparison of groups revealed a significant inverse association between bandwidth values and artifact areas of the stainless-steel bracket and the self-ligating ceramic bracket with a stainless-steel slot (P<0.05). The areas of artifacts from the ceramic bracket were the smallest, but were not reduced significantly in pulse sequences with higher bandwidth values (P<0.05). Significant differences were also observed between 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI using SE and UTE, but not using GE 2-dimensional or 3-dimensional pulse sequences.

Conclusion: Higher receiver bandwidth might be indicated to prevent artifacts from orthodontic appliances in 1.5 T and 3.0 T MRI using SE and UTE pulse sequences.

Å°¿öµå

Dental Materials; Magnetic Resonance Imaging; Artifacts; Orthodontic Brackets

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed