Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Push-out bond strength and dentinal tubule penetration of different root canal sealers used with coated core materials

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2016³â 41±Ç 2È£ p.114 ~ 120
Sungur Derya Deniz, Purali Nuhan, Cosgun Erdal, Calt Semra,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Sungur Derya Deniz ) - Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Endodontics
 ( Purali Nuhan ) - Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine Department of Biophysics
 ( Cosgun Erdal ) - Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Biostatistics
 ( Calt Semra ) - Hacettepe University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Endodontics

Abstract


Objectives: The aim of this study was to compare the push-out bond strength and dentinal tubule penetration of root canal sealers used with coated core materials and conventional gutta-percha.

Materials and Methods: A total of 72 single-rooted human mandibular incisors were instrumented with NiTi rotary files with irrigation of 2.5% NaOCl. The smear layer was removed with 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). Specimens were assigned into four groups according to the obturation system: Group 1, EndoRez (Ultradent Product Inc.); Group 2, Activ GP (Brasseler); Group 3, SmartSeal (DFRP Ltd. Villa Farm); Group 4, AH 26 (Dentsply de Trey)/gutta-percha (GP). For push-out bond strength measurement, two horizontal slices were obtained from each specimen (n = 20). To compare dentinal tubule penetration, remaining 32 roots assigned to 4 groups as above were obturated with 0.1% Rhodamine B labeled sealers. One horizontal slice was obtained from the middle third of each specimen (n = 8) and scanned under confocal laser scanning electron microscope. Tubule penetration area, depth, and percentage were measured. Kruskall-Wallis test was used for statistical analysis.

Results: EndoRez showed significantly lower push-out bond strength than the others (p < 0.05). No significant difference was found amongst the groups in terms of percentage of sealer penetration. SmartSeal showed the least penetration than the others (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: The bond strength and sealer penetration of resin-and glass ionomer-based sealers used with coated core was not superior to resin-based sealer used with conventional GP. Dentinal tubule penetration has limited effect on bond strength. The use of conventional GP with sealer seems to be sufficient in terms of push-out bond strength.

Å°¿öµå

Adhesion; Coated core; Monoblock; Root canal sealer; Tubule penetration

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed