Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Comparison of the shaping ability of novel thermally treated reciprocating instruments

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2018³â 43±Ç 2È£ p.15 ~ 15
Keskin Cangul, Demiral Murat, Sar©¥yilmaz Evren,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Keskin Cangul ) - Ondokuz May©¥s University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Endodontics
 ( Demiral Murat ) - Cekmekoy Oral Health Center
 ( Sar©¥yilmaz Evren ) - Ordu University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Endodontics

Abstract


Objectives: The present study aimed to evaluate the shaping ability of 2 thermally treated nickel-titanium reciprocating systems in simulated curved canals.

Materials and Methods: Forty simulated canals were prepared to apical size 25 using Reciproc Blue R25 (VDW) and WaveOne Gold Primary (Dentsply Sirona) instruments. Standard pre- and post-preparation images were taken and superimposed. The removal of resin material was measured at 5 standard points: the canal orifice, halfway between the canal orifice and the beginning of the curve, the beginning of the curve, the apex of the curve, and the end-point of the simulated canal. The data were analysed using the independent sample t-test with a 5% significance threshold.

Results: The canals in which Reciproc Blue R25 was used showed a significantly greater widening than those in which WaveOne Gold was used at 4 of the 5 measurement points (p < 0.05). The Reciproc Blue R25 instrument removed significantly more resin from the inner aspect of the curve at 2 of the 5 points and similar amounts at the remaining 3 points. At the 2 apical points, there was no significant difference between the Reciproc Blue R25 and WaveOne Gold Primary instruments.

Conclusion: Both instruments respected the original canal anatomy; however, WaveOne Gold resulted in a more conservative shape with less transportation.

Å°¿öµå

Reciproc Blue; WaveOne Gold; Nickel-titanium instruments; Simulated root canals

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed