Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Comparison of light-transmittance in dental tissues and dental composite restorations using incremental layering build-up with varying enamel resin layer thickness

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2018³â 43±Ç 2È£ p.22 ~ 22
Maia Rodrigo Rocha, Oliveira Dayane, D¡ÇAntonio Tracy, Qian Fang, Skiff Frederick,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Maia Rodrigo Rocha ) - University of Iowa College of Dentistry Department of Operative Dentistry
 ( Oliveira Dayane ) - University of Campinas Piracicaba Dental School Department of Restorative Dentistry
 ( D¡ÇAntonio Tracy ) - University of Iowa College of Dentistry Department of Operative Dentistry
 ( Qian Fang ) - University of Iowa College of Dentistry Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry
 ( Skiff Frederick ) - University of Iowa College of Liberal Arts & Sciences Department of Physics and Astronomy

Abstract


Objectives: To evaluate and compare light-transmittance in dental tissues and dental composite restorations using the incremental double-layer technique with varying layer thickness.

Materials and Methods: B1-colored natural teeth slabs were compared to dental restoration build-ups with A2D and B1E-colored nanofilled, supra-nanofilled, microfilled, and microhybrid composites. The enamel layer varied from 0.3, 0.5, or 1.2 mm thick, and the dentin layer was varied to provide a standardized 3.7 mm overall sample thickness (n = 10). All increments were light-cured to 16 J/cm2 with a multi-wave LED (Valo, Ultradent). Using a spectrophotometer, the samples were irradiated by an RGB laser beam. A voltmeter recorded the light output signal to calculate the light-transmittance through the specimens. The data were analyzed using 1-way analysis of variance followed by the post hoc Tukey's test (p = 0.05).

Results: Mean light-transmittance observed at thicker final layers of enamel were significantly lower than those observed at thinner final layers. Within 1.2 mm final enamel resin layer (FERL) thickness, all composites were similar to the dental tissues, with exception of the nanofilled composite. However, within 0.5 mm FERL thickness, only the supra-nanofilled composite showed no difference from the dental tissues. Within 0.3 mm FERL thickness, none of the composites were similar to the dental tissues.

Conclusions: The supra-nanofilled composite had the most similar light-transmittance pattern when compared to the natural teeth. However, for other composites, thicker FERL have a greater chance to match the light-transmittance of natural dental tissues.

Å°¿öµå

Composite Resins; Micro-hybrid composite; Nanofilled composite; Supra-nanofilled composite

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed