Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Microtensile bond strength of CAD/CAM-fabricated polymer-ceramics to different adhesive resin cements

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2018³â 43±Ç 4È£ p.40 ~ 40
Sadighpour Leyla, Geramipanah Farideh, Ghasri Zahra, Neshatian Mehrnoosh,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Sadighpour Leyla ) - Tehran University of Medical Sciences School of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics
 ( Geramipanah Farideh ) - Tehran University of Medical Sciences School of Dentistry Department of Prosthodontics
 ( Ghasri Zahra ) - Shahed University Faculty of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry
 ( Neshatian Mehrnoosh ) - University of Toronto Faculty of Dentistry Matrix Dynamic Group

Abstract


Objectives: This study evaluated the microtensile bond strength (¥ìTBS) of polymer-ceramic and indirect composite resin with 3 classes of resin cements.

Materials and Methods: Two computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM)-fabricated polymer-ceramics (Enamic [ENA; Vita] and Lava Ultimate [LAV; 3M ESPE]) and a laboratory indirect composite resin (Gradia [GRA; GC Corp.]) were equally divided into 6 groups (n = 18) with 3 classes of resin cements: Variolink N (VAR; Vivadent), RelyX U200 (RXU; 3M ESPE), and Panavia F2 (PAN; Kuraray). The ¥ìTBS values were compared between groups by 2-way analysis of variance and the post hoc Tamhane test (¥á = 0.05).

Results: Restorative materials and resin cements significantly influenced ¥ìTBS (p < 0.05). In the GRA group, the highest ¥ìTBS was found with RXU (27.40 ¡¾ 5.39 N) and the lowest with VAR (13.54 ¡¾ 6.04 N) (p < 0.05). Similar trends were observed in the ENA group. In the LAV group, the highest ¥ìTBS was observed with VAR (27.45 ¡¾ 5.84 N) and the lowest with PAN (10.67 ¡¾ 4.37 N) (p < 0.05). PAN had comparable results to those of ENA and GRA, whereas the ¥ìTBS values were significantly lower with LAV (p = 0.001). The highest bond strength of RXU was found with GRA (27.40 ¡¾ 5.39 N, p = 0.001). PAN showed the lowest ¥ìTBS with LAV (10.67 ¡¾ 4.37 N; p < 0.001).

Conclusions: When applied according to the manufacturers' recommendations, the ¥ìTBS of polymer-ceramic CAD/CAM materials and indirect composites is influenced by the luting cements.

Å°¿öµå

Indirect composite resin; Microtensile bond strength; Polymer-ceramic CAD/CAM materials; Resin cements

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed