Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

The polymerization efficiency of a bulk-fill composite based on matrix-modification technology

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2020³â 45±Ç 3È£ p.32 ~ 32
Elshazly Tarek M., Bourauel Christoph, Aboushelib Moustafa N., Sherief Dalia I., El-Korashy Dalia I.,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Elshazly Tarek M. ) - University of Bonn School of Dentistry Oral Technology
 ( Bourauel Christoph ) - University of Bonn School of Dentistry Oral Technology
 ( Aboushelib Moustafa N. ) - Alexandria University Faculty of Dentistry Dental Biomaterials Department
 ( Sherief Dalia I. ) - Ain Shams University Faculty of Dentistry Biomaterials Department
 ( El-Korashy Dalia I. ) - Ain Shams University Faculty of Dentistry Biomaterials Department

Abstract


Objectives: To evaluate the polymerization efficiency of a matrix-modified bulk-fill composite, and compare it to a conventional composite which has a similar filler system. The degree of conversion (DC%) and monomer elution were measured over different storage periods. Additionally, fillers' content was examined.

Materials and Methods: Cylindrical specimens were prepared, in bulk and incrementally, from Filtek Bulk Fill (B) and Filtek Supreme XTE (S) composites using a Teflon mold, for each test (n = 6). Using attenuated total reflection method of Fourier transformation infrared spectroscopy, DC% was measured after 24 hours, 7 days, and 30 days. Using high-performance liquid chromatography, elution of hydroxyethyl methacrylate, triethylene glycol dimethacrylate, urethane dimethacrylate, and bisphenol-A glycidyl dimethacrylate was measured after 24 hours, 7 days and 30 days. Filler content was examined by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Data were analyzed using 2-way mixed-model analysis of variance (¥á = 0.05).

Results: There was no significant difference in DC% over different storage periods between B-bulk and S-incremental. Higher monomer elution was detected significantly from S than B. The elution quantity and rate varied significantly over storage periods and between different monomers. SEM images showed differences in fillers' sizes and agglomeration between both materials.

Conclusions: Matrix-modified bulk-fill composites could be packed and cured in bulk with polymerization efficiency similar to conventional composites.

Å°¿öµå

Degree of conversion; Dental restoration; Monomer elution; Smart polymer; SEM

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed