Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Enhanced visualization of the root canal morphology using a chitosan-based endo-radiopaque solution

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2021³â 46±Ç 3È£ p.33 ~ 33
Govind Shashirekha, Jena Amit, Pattanaik Satabdi, Anarasi Mahaprasad, Mohapatra Satyajit, Shivagange Vinay,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Govind Shashirekha ) - S¡¯O¡¯A University Institute of Dental Sciences Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
 ( Jena Amit ) - Utkal University Sriram Chandra Bhanja Dental College and Hospital Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
 ( Pattanaik Satabdi ) - S¡¯O¡¯A University Institute of Dental Sciences Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
 ( Anarasi Mahaprasad ) - Utkal University Hi-Tech Dental College and Hospital Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
 ( Mohapatra Satyajit ) - Utkal University Sriram Chandra Bhanja Dental College and Hospital Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics
 ( Shivagange Vinay ) - University Complutense of Madrid Oman Dental College Adult Restorative Dentistry - Endodontics

Abstract


Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of ionic and non-ionic-based contrast media (in vitro study) and the combinatorial effect of chitosan-based endo-radiopaque solution (CERS) (in vivo study) for visualization of the root canal anatomy.

Materials and Methods: In vitro study (120 teeth): The root canal of maxillary premolars and molars (in vitro group 1 and 2 respectively, n = 60 each) were analyzed using 4 different contrast media (subgroups: Omnipaque 350, Iopamidol, Xenetix 350, and Urografin 76; n = 15 each) in combination with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (NaOCl). Based on the results of the in vitro study, in vivo study (80 teeth) was done to compare Xenetix 350 + 5.25% NaOCl with CERS (in vivo group 1 and 2 respectively, n = 40 each) on maxillary and mandibular premolars and molars. Two endodontists used radiovisiography to assess the depth of ingress and identify the aberrant root anatomy after access cavity preparation, and after initial cleaning and shaping of canals. Kruskal-Wallis test was used for in vitro comparison (p < 0.05), and Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Mann-Whitney U test for in vivo analysis (p < 0.01).

Results: In vitro study, Xenetix 350 + 5.25% NaOCl facilitated a significant higher visualization (p < 0.05). For in vivo study, CERS had a statistically significant depth of ingress (p < 0.01), and was efficient in identifying the aberrant root canal anatomy of premolars and molars.

Conclusions: CERS facilitates better visualization of the root canal anatomy of human premolars and molars.

Å°¿öµå

Chitosan; Contrast media; Digital radiography; Root canal anatomy

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed