Anesthetic efficacy in vital asymptomatic teeth using different local anesthetics: a systematic review with network meta-analysis
Liew Amy Kia Cheen, Yeh Yi-Chun, Abdullah Dalia, Tu Yu-Kang,
소속 상세정보
( Liew Amy Kia Cheen ) - Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Faculty of Dentistry Department of Family Oral Health
( Yeh Yi-Chun ) - National Taiwan University Hospital Department of Medical Research
( Abdullah Dalia ) - Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia Faculty of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry
( Tu Yu-Kang ) - National Taiwan University College of Public Health Institute of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine
Abstract
Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of various local anesthesia (LA) in vital asymptomatic teeth.
Materials and Methods: Randomized controlled trials comparing pulpal anesthesia of various LA on vital asymptomatic teeth were included in this review. Searches were conducted in the Cochrane CENTRAL, MEDLINE (via PubMed), EMBASE, ClinicalTrials.gov, Google Scholar and 3 field-specific journals from inception to May 3, 2019. Study selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment using Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool were done by 2 independent reviewers in duplicate. Network meta-analysis (NMA) was performed within the frequentist setting using STATA 15.0. The LA was ranked, and the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) line was plotted. The confidence of the NMA estimates was assessed using the CINeMA web application.
Results: The literature search yielded 1,678 potentially eligible reports, but only 42 were included in this review. For maxillary buccal infiltration, articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000 was more efficacious than lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:100,000 (odds ratio, 2.11; 95% confidence interval, 1.14?3.89). For mandibular buccal infiltration, articaine 4% with epinephrine 1:100,000 was more efficacious than various lidocaine solutions. The SUCRA ranking was highest for articaine 4% with epinephrine when used as maxillary and mandibular buccal infiltrations, and lidocaine 2% with epinephrine 1:80,000 when used as inferior alveolar nerve block. Inconsistency and imprecision were detected in some of the NMA estimates.
Conclusions: Articaine 4% with epinephrine is superior when maxillary or mandibular infiltration is required in vital asymptomatic teeth.
키워드
Inferior alveolar nerve block; Local anesthetic; Maxillary infiltration; Meta-analysis; Systematic review
원문 및 링크아웃 정보
등재저널 정보