Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Combination of a new ultrasonic tip with rotary systems for the preparation of flattened root canals

Restorative Dentistry & Endodontics 2021³â 46±Ç 4È£ p.56 ~ 56
Tavares Karina Ines Medina Carita, Pinto Jader Camilo, Santos-Junior Airton Oliveira, Torres Fernanda Ferrari Esteves, Guerreiro-Tanomaru Juliane Maria, Tanomaru-Filho Mario,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Tavares Karina Ines Medina Carita ) - Sao Paulo State University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry
 ( Pinto Jader Camilo ) - Sao Paulo State University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry
 ( Santos-Junior Airton Oliveira ) - Sao Paulo State University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry
 ( Torres Fernanda Ferrari Esteves ) - Sao Paulo State University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry
 ( Guerreiro-Tanomaru Juliane Maria ) - Sao Paulo State University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry
 ( Tanomaru-Filho Mario ) - Sao Paulo State University School of Dentistry Department of Restorative Dentistry

Abstract


Objectives: This study evaluated 2 nickel-titanium rotary systems and a complementary protocol with an ultrasonic tip and a small-diameter instrument in flattened root canals.

Materials and Methods: Thirty-two human maxillary second premolars with flattened canals (buccolingual diameter ¡Ã4 times larger than the mesiodistal diameter) at 9 mm from the radiographic apex were selected. The root canals were prepared by ProDesign Logic (PDL) 30/0.01 and 30/0.05 or Hyflex EDM (HEDM) 10/0.05 and 25/0.08 (n = 16), followed by application of the Flatsonic ultrasonic tip in the cervical and middle thirds and a PDL 25/0.03 file in the apical third (FPDL). The teeth were scanned using micro-computed tomography before and after the procedures. The percentage of volume increase, debris, and uninstrumented surface area were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn, Wilcoxon, analysis of variance/Tukey, and paired and unpaired t-tests (¥á = 0.05).

Results: No significant difference was found in the volume increase and uninstrumented surface area between PDL and HEDM (p > 0.05). PDL had a higher percentage of debris than HEDM in the middle and apical thirds (p < 0.05). The FPDL protocol resulted in less debris and uninstrumented surface area for PDL and HEDM (p < 0.05). This protocol, with HEDM, reduced debris in the middle and apical thirds and uninstrumented surface area in the apical third (p < 0.05).

Conclusions: High percentages of debris and uninstrumented surface area were observed after preparation of flattened root canals. The HEDM, Flatsonic tip, and 25/0.03 instrument protocol enhanced cleaning in flattened root canals.

Å°¿öµå

Dental pulp cavity; Root canal preparation; Ultrasonic therapy; X-ray microtomography

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

KCI
KoreaMed