Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Chemical cleansing as an adjunct to subgingival instrumentation with ultrasonic and hand devices in deep periodontal pockets: a randomized controlled study

Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science 2021³â 51±Ç 4È£ p.276 ~ 284
Zafar Fahad, Romano Federica, Citterio Filippo, Ferrarotti Francesco, Dellavia Claudia, Àå¹®ÅÃ, Aimetti Mario,
¼Ò¼Ó »ó¼¼Á¤º¸
 ( Zafar Fahad ) - University of Turin C.I.R. Dental School Department of Surgical Sciences
 ( Romano Federica ) - University of Turin C.I.R. Dental School Department of Surgical Sciences
 ( Citterio Filippo ) - University of Turin C.I.R. Dental School Department of Surgical Sciences
 ( Ferrarotti Francesco ) - University of Turin C.I.R. Dental School Department of Surgical Sciences
 ( Dellavia Claudia ) - University of Milan Department of Biomedical, Surgical and Dental Sciences
Àå¹®Åà( Chang Moon-Taek ) - Chonbuk National University School of Dentistry Department of Periodontology
 ( Aimetti Mario ) - University of Turin C.I.R. Dental School Department of Surgical Sciences

Abstract


Purpose: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to assess whether chemical cleansing using a sulfonic/sulfuric acid gel solution (HBX) as an adjunct to scaling and root planing (SRP) resulted in a decrease in residual plaque and calculus in deep periodontal pockets compared to SRP alone.

Methods: Fifty-six patients with 56 hopeless posterior teeth, scheduled for extraction due to severe periodontitis, were enrolled in this study. Each tooth was randomly assigned to 1 of the 2 experimental procedures. The test teeth were subjected to the irrigation of the subgingival area with HBX for 2 minutes, followed by SRP with hand and ultrasonic instruments for 14 minutes, and then extracted. The control teeth received only mechanical instrumentation before extraction. Residual biofilm was evaluated on photographs and measured as total area and percentage of root surface covered by remaining plaque (RP) or calculus (RC) after treatment.

Results: The initial pocket depth (PD) and total subgingival root surface area were similar between the 2 treatment groups. After treatment, the total subgingival root area covered by RP and RC was statistically significantly larger (P<0.001) in the control group than in the test group. The test teeth showed a lower percentage of RP, but a higher percentage of RC than the control teeth (both P<0.001). Complete calculus removal was achieved in 42% of the control teeth surfaces and in 25% of the test teeth surfaces for a PD of 4 mm.

Conclusions: The additional chemical cleansing with HBX resulted in a statistically significant improvement in bacterial plaque removal during SRP of deep pockets, but it was not effective in reducing calculus deposits.

Å°¿öµå

Decontamination; Dental calculus; Periodontitis; Root planing; Sulfates

¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸

  

µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸

SCI(E)
KCI
KoreaMed